What if everything we thought we knew about risk was wrong or only partial? What if the real problem was never risk itself—but our broken relationship with it and our go-to reaction to it? If so, the best path forward is to set aside our past assumptions and begin anew.

How do you typically react when facing risk? Here are four ways most people respond. See which best describes your risk footprint.

In a world that spiraling more out of control each day, it’s natural to want to risk little, especially when it comes to our hearts. It feels safer. But is it?

How does God approach risk? In the New York Times bestselling book, Wild at Heart, John Eldredge describes it this way:

We aren’t asked to risk by One unfamiliar with the concept. God risks in love, and invites us to do the same.

Some get an adrenaline rush from risk-taking while others run at the first sign of risk. Regardless of what we think of risk, it’s an unavoidable part of our lives.

We’ve spent the last two months looking at the clash between the real and the artificial. The question now is what part will we play in this unfolding cosmic drama? The answer, in large part, depends on how we view risk.

One of my dad’s expressions was, “It is what it is.”

We look at the world and see the wrong ideas and voices gaining momentum while the people and desires of God are mocked and silenced. The trajectory to a plastic, techno future seems unstoppable and inevitable, so we begin to lose hope.

Progress has led to some wonderful advancements. That’s true. And it’s equally true that all progress doesn’t always make our lives better. And often makes it worse.

We need to stop rationalizing our slide into the artificial. This can happen in big and small ways.

In his book Scary Smart, former Chief Business Officer of Google Mo Gawdat encourages us to continue engaging and investing in AI so we can reprogram it for good things. He warns that it’s up to us if we don’t want to go to war with the machines. There’s that word again... Machines.

I’m not anti-technology. But I also refuse to believe progress is always good. Especially if the new offering requires me to spend more time or be more dependent on the artificial than God.

Neil Postman made this astute comment forty years ago in his classic work, Amusing Ourselves to Death:

I have a friend who wholeheartedly embraces the ongoing advances in artificial intelligence. When I asked her why, she shared her belief that Christians have always been slow to embrace new technology and opportunities. She doesn’t want to make the same mistake when it comes to AI.

In September 2023, a church in Texas held a service written entirely by artificial intelligence. The Austin church described the experiment this way: “This Sunday, we’re entering somewhat uncharted territory by letting ChatGPT create the order of worship, prayers, sermon, liturgy, and even an original song for our 10 a.m. service.”

I’ve been in countless conversations with those in business and ministry about the issues of the real and the artificial that I’m raising here. Honestly, it makes most people uncomfortable.

We’re in the process of looking at Five Lies of the Artificial. The first lie is that the artificial is real. (If you missed that reading, you can find it here: The Artificial Isn’t Real).

“The Machine” is how many have come to define the rise of the artificial. It doesn’t simply refer to technology in a generic way, but to the overall system that is undergirding and infiltrating every aspect of life.

Next time you’re at a restaurant, lift your eyes from your own phone for a second and look around. Practically everyone—whether with a family, on a date, or with friends— is staring at their screen. Even when people are together, they find what’s on the screen more fascinating than who’s sitting across from them.